<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>BERG &#187; widgets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://berglondon.com/blog/tag/widgets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://berglondon.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 19:55:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Widgets, widgets, everywhere</title>
		<link>http://berglondon.com/blog/2006/11/27/widgets-widgets-everywhere/</link>
		<comments>http://berglondon.com/blog/2006/11/27/widgets-widgets-everywhere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Nov 2006 21:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Matt Webb</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3c]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webapps]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://schulzeandwebb.com/blog/2006/11/27/widgets-widgets-everywhere/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#8217;s been rather an explosion of desktop, mobile, browser and Web widgets. Recently, too, I was groping round the idea of web apps situated outside the computer&#8211;but not getting very far. Then I was chatting over email about the Chumby, a cute, carryable, dedicated widget platform&#8230; and situated web apps ideas finally locked into focus: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been rather an <a href="http://gallery.live.com/">explosion</a> <a href="http://www.sixapart.com/typepad/widgets/">of</a> <a href="http://widgets.yahoo.com/">desktop</a>, <a href="https://www.widsets.com/">mobile</a>, <a href="http://widgets.opera.com/">browser</a> <a href="http://automattic.com/code/widgets/">and</a> <a href="http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-widgets-20061109/">Web</a> <a href="http://www.apple.com/downloads/dashboard/">widgets</a>. Recently, too, I was groping round the idea of <a href="http://interconnected.org/notes/2006/09/webapps/?p=12">web apps situated outside the computer</a>&#8211;but not getting very far. Then I was chatting over email about the <a href="http://chumby.com/corporate">Chumby</a>, a cute, carryable, dedicated widget platform&#8230; and situated web apps ideas finally locked into focus:</p>
<p><strong>Widgets embedded in everything.</strong></p>
<p>My camera, video camera, phone, mp3 player, TV, DVD player and car stereo all have embedded electronics, a control surface and a display. My washing machine and oven have micro-controllers and an interface&#8211;I don&#8217;t know whether my house thermostat is electronic, but it could be.</p>
<p>In short: I am surrounded by objects which do things, all with embedded computing and screens. What if I could run whatever applications I wanted to on them? What if, let&#8217;s say, each of them was a widget platform, allowing code upload and exposing a hardware API to all sensors and controls?</p>
<h3>Hardware as an open platform</h3>
<p>If I was a pro-am photographer on a month-long safari shoot, I could grab a custom camera interface from the Web, set up to provide easy-access presets to the light and movement conditions I&#8217;d face. I&#8217;d repurpose a couple of the external buttons to twiddle parameters in the presets, and have a perfect wildlife interface for four weeks. At home, I&#8217;d revert to the general purpose interface or get another one.</p>
<p>If I could sell widgets for compact cameras, I&#8217;d sell one that was specially made for nights out. It&#8217;d assess the conditions and get the best possible picture given the dark, the necessity of taking a quick shot, and the inability of the drunk person holding the camera to stop swaying.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have an interface on my washing machine that had only the single setting I use. I&#8217;d load and set the machine early in the morning or late at night, and it&#8217;d then display a red, flashing &#8220;ready to go&#8221; button that I could slap on my way out of the house, after my morning shower. Perhaps it would use the hardware API to the pressure on the water intake, to refuse to start if the shower was in use.</p>
<p>My TV would use its video buffer and the remote control API to give me a dedicated &#8220;record this advert&#8221; button.</p>
<p>Hey, maybe I&#8217;d even <a href="http://hackingroomba.com/">hack my vacuum cleaner</a> and <a href="http://www.makezine.com/blog/archive/2006/03/etech_2006_roomble_roomba_figh.html">have it fight</a>.</p>
<p>Why <em>can&#8217;t</em> I write widgets to run on everything in my pockets and everything in my home? I don&#8217;t really mean <a href="http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/smarthomehks/toc.html">home automation</a>&#8211;I mean using the existing control surface to interface with the hardware in a way that I chose.</p>
<p>I want to download widgets off the Web, scan barcodes with my oven to share recipes with my friends on <a href="http://www.last.fm/">last.microwave</a>, and hard-code my radio to never miss <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/">Radio 4</a> comedy. This is what I mean about <a href="http://schulzeandwebb.com/blog/2006/11/21/3c-products/">3C products tapping into creativity, community and connectedness</a>, by the way.</p>
<h3>What Nikon should do</h3>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/cameras">Professional Nikon cameras aren&#8217;t doing so well against Canon right now</a>. If I were Nikon, I&#8217;d document the hardware API to the camera files, the jacks, the display and the controls, stick Bluetooth in it, and throw the camera open as a software platform. Then as a professional purchaser, I&#8217;d have a significant decision to make: Do I put down a year&#8217;s purchasing power on a Canon, and risk having a Nikon-owning competitor later creating an interface that makes them twice as effective&#8230; or get a Nikon so I never get left behind?</p>
<h3>Embedded widgets are already here</h3>
<p>We already have widgets in some things, of course. My <a href="http://www.nokia.com/n70">Nokia N70</a> runs <a href="http://opensource.nokia.com/projects/pythonfors60/">Python</a>, which now has the ability to intercept and send SMS, run full-screen apps, and is provided with APIs to the camera, calendar, contacts, the internet and more. That the small Python app can bridge the hardware API with all the other APIs on the internet, using the existing display and keys, is what makes this so powerful.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another data-point: The <a href="http://www.imagerunner.com/ir_home.html">Canon imageRunner series</a> of networked copier/scanner/printers have what they call <a href="http://www.developersupport.canon.com/meap.htm">Java MEAP</a>: A platform to write and run your own apps on the copier. (Thanks <a href="http://swardley.blogspot.com/">Simon Wardley</a> for alerting me.) As <a href="http://www.canon.com/technology/interview/meap/meap_p1.html">this MEAP interview</a> says:</p>
<blockquote><p>It&#8217;s not so difficult to include a variety of useful functions in an application so that anyone can use it. Yet, as user requirements vary widely, the application becomes bloated, impairing its operability. &#8230; Users can replace the applications as their needs change and enjoy simple operation.</p></blockquote>
<p>Exactly. Products made for everyone are complex! Let all of <em>us</em> help out to design them just for our friends. Canon&#8217;s doing it for workaday, now give me everyday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss></wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
